YES 0.707 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:



HASKELL
  ↳ LR

mainModule Main
  ((length :: [a ->  Int) :: [a ->  Int)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\n_→n + 1

is transformed to
length0 n _ = n + 1



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
HASKELL
      ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((length :: [a ->  Int) :: [a ->  Int)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
HASKELL
          ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((length :: [a ->  Int) :: [a ->  Int)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
HASKELL
              ↳ NumRed

mainModule Main
  ((length :: [a ->  Int) :: [a ->  Int)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Num Reduction: All numbers are transformed to thier corresponding representation with Pos, Neg, Succ and Zero.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ NumRed
HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (length :: [a ->  Int)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ NumRed
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
QDP
                      ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_enforceWHNF(vy5, vy310, vy4, :(vy3110, vy3111), ba) → new_enforceWHNF(new_primPlusNat(vy5), vy3110, new_primPlusNat(vy5), vy3111, ba)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

new_primPlusNat(Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vy500)) → Succ(vy500)
new_primPlusNat(Succ(vy50)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat0(vy50)))
new_primPlusNat0(Zero) → Zero

The set Q consists of the following terms:

new_primPlusNat0(Succ(x0))
new_primPlusNat(Zero)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero)
new_primPlusNat(Succ(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: